As Whites become a smaller percentage of humans both in the U.S. and worldwide, some Whites sniff, incorrectly, that Whites should breed for quality instead of quantity and that's how, they say, we'll stave off our extinction.
Nature disagrees. It is so obvious that quantity is what is needed for the survival of a group, that one feels silly even having to argue the point. The simple truth is that Whites, no less than any other living things must breed or die.
Furthermore, this is not the right time for neo-eugenicism. How many stories do some people have to read about blonds dying out or blue eyes becoming rare to get it? How many once mostly white cities and countries, now full of non-whites, do some people need to visit to understand? You don't win life's game by being the few. You win by being the many.
Expansion is life, contraction is death. At present, Whites are on a death spiral caused by their contraction.
To get quality (no matter how you define that term), we need to have quantity. Breed like crazy and the best among us will automatically claw their way to the top and they'll produce more like themselves as a natural state of affairs once we strip our minds of false ideas about existence. By out breeding others we also breed our own people to fill every societal and workaday niche in society, and this acts as a bar against others coming to our lands. You can only stuff so much in a ten pound box. When it's full, it's full. Fill it with your own, or others will fill it with theirs.
We really do need to get out of this sleep-like state we're in as a people and understand about existence and survival and the purpose and meaning of life and how nature works.
As we seek understanding, we first need to know that all of existence is a struggle to be, to be more, and for dominance of your type. Or, to put this in other terms, all of existence is a fight for the best seat in the house. It is this way from subatomic particles to entire galaxies of millions of stars. And, it is no less so with us.
Even within our individual bodies there is a struggle between individual genes for expression. Everything is in conflict for existence and dominance. All of existence is a vast spinning, whirling battle to bring forth the best. The lion does not and never can lie down with the lamb. To think that is possible and desirable is to give way to neurotic thought processes. If the lion were to lie down with the lamb, it'd starve and cease to be. Lions eat lambs. That's part of the conflict. That's nature, and nature isn't something to be overcome, but it is something for us to understand so that we can find the path that will lead us to higher consciousness.
We also need to understand that the individual human being isn't important in the big picture. It is his or her internal code--the genotype that leads to the phenotype that is important, i.e. his or her collected genes that make the person what he or she is. In our case, this means we are coded for white skin, our particular bone structure, our head shape, our hair, our eyes, and all the rest of the things that make us a unique people.
Of course there are differences among our people in many of these things, but we know who is a White person and who isn't pretty much just by looking at them and their offspring. If they look white and if they produce White children they're probably White and that means they're part of our people. There's no need to over complicate the issue and split hairs about Nordics and Alpines and any of the various other divisions that some dwell on. We need to be able to understand who is us and who is not us, and it's all gene dependent. Those who are us, have similar genes and thus look like us. Those who are not us, don't. And, it doesn't matter if those who are not us share our political and social views and just about everything else. Genes and genes alone determine who is us and who is not us. That's nature's law.
It is our internal code that must survive. We are the finished beings "spun" by our internal code to be as we are. It is that internal code--the genotype that gives us our external appearance, our phenotype, that is important.
Of course, those who argue for quality over quantity usually mean that we should breed people just like them. Will they breed themselves? Not usually. Many of these quality-firsters are self-absorbed and lack true vitality. Many are childless or have limited the number of children they have. Shun them as if your continued existence depends on it, because it may.
You'll hear them saying things such as "Oh, taxes are too high so I can't have children," or "My wife and I have decided the Earth is too crowded so we're going to help save the environment by not having children," or "I haven't met the right person yet." Some will then say snide things about welfare mothers who have many children but who can't support them and how they're not going to do that.
Such people need to rethink their biases, because their way is the way of extinction. That welfare mother with many children, will have her children dance on the graves of these effete Whites who don't reproduce to their maximum. But, instead of getting blue in the face arguing finer points of why I know I'm right and why we must start having large, no, HUGE, White families again, I'll just switch to a recent news story about squirrels in England.
In brief, the red squirrels in England have almost been wiped out by the grey squirrels and now the grey squirrels are being wiped out by the black squirrels.
It's now been confirmed that the black squirrels in England are all the offspring of a single black squirrel from America that escaped into the wild in the 1880's and mated with grey squirrels. The offspring of the single black squirrel and the grey squirrels weren't grey squirrels--but more black squirrels.
If you don't understand why the offspring are black squirrels and not grey squirrels or why they're not half black and half grey, just look at Barack Obama for a clue. Want another clue? Dominant vs. recessive genes. Also, the black squirrels are now breeding more, they're more aggressive, and they're taking over squirrel land. It's no more complicated than that. Their black squirrel genes are becoming a larger percentage in the squirrel gene pool than other squirrel genes.
If the losing red and grey squirrels could talk, one imagines they'd be saying what we hear some Whites saying about how they represent quality. Ho hum. Bye bye deadender squirrels. You have not adapted, you have not been able to compete, you have not bred to your maximum. You are on your way to extinction with all your snooty "quality." If you produced more of yourselves, you'd take back your land. But, as it is, your genes are being replaced in the squirrel gene pool. Love your diversity while you can.
This is the way of nature. It is the same with squirrels as it is with all living things including all humans and, of course also, White people.
But there is one difference. We humans can use our brains to understand what's happening and we can consciously adapt and take proper steps so that we don't become extinct. In other words, our fate is not sealed as is the fate of the red and grey squirrels. They don't have a clue about what's going on. They can't count or think abstract thoughts. They just know there are newer squirrels who don't look like them and who seem to be more numerous with each passing year, while those who look like them are fewer and fewer.
Pretending still that the squirrels could talk, might we not hear some squirrels tell any reds and greys, who see the extinction that is looming, that it's racist for them to notice that they're being killed off by the blacks, and that all squirrels bleed red blood, and that under the fur all squirrels are the same, and that it is the content of the character of squirrels that is important, and that diversity is their strength?
We can learn many things from the plight of the red and grey squirrels, but one thing that must be drummed into us is the fact that if we White humans are to survive and not become extinct, we must mate only with others who also have our recessive genes. To do otherwise is to simply be incubators for those unlike us as was the case with the grey squirrels that originally mated with the black squirrels.
Remember, it takes two White people--a White male and a White female--to produce new White people, but it only takes one non-White mated with a White to produce a non-White.
It's the same principle with squirrels. It takes two grey squirrels to produce a grey squirrel and it takes two red squirrels to produce a red squirrel, but it only takes one black squirrel mated with red or grey squirrels to produce black squirrels.
Yes, I know it's more complicated than that and that Mendelian laws enter the picture, but this is still a good rule of thumb. If you doubt it, go look at the diminishing numbers of the soon to be extinct red and grey squirrels. Better yet, go look at the diminishing numbers of the soon to be extinct White humans (unless we start adapting and producing more of ourselves).
# # #
THREE BOOKS BY HARD TO PIGEONHOLE H. MILLARD
All three books are now listed on Amazon.com.
The lefties at the OC WEEKLY said Millard is one of OC's most frightening people.
"Millard is an important writer" New Nation News
"I consider H. Millard one of the most brilliant writers and analysts
Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack's Religion
ROAMING THE WASTELANDS
THE OUTSIDER - (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9)
|Views expressed by guest columnists, reporters and external links not necessarily those of the editor of New Nation News but hopefully of some interest|