Can't get a handle on why President Bush is leaving our borders open and why he wants to legalize millions of illegal aliens and why he's allowing in more and more people from all over the Third World? Here's a just-right-porridge theory on this. Maybe you'll think this has some merit. Maybe you won't. See what you think.
Before proceeding, however, we need to understand that
the massive immigration, legal and otherwise, that we see happening
in America is also happening world wide and we need to fearlessly tell
the truth: what is going on is that the non-white Third World is invading
the white First World--often euphemistically called the Western World.
This is happening partly because the white First World is less populated
than the non-white Third World and has a low birth rate. In other words,
the white First World is creating unfilled societal niches and a vacuum
that are being filled by others who find white First World nations more
desirable than their own non-white Third World nations. Think: "nature
abhors a vacuum," but in human terms.
It is also a simple fact of existence that all living things tend to gravitate to where they are more comfortable, and the white First World is more comfortable than the non-white Third World. In addition, living things, no less than electricity or water, seek the path of least resistance. Immigrants will continue flowing into white First World nations so long as these white First World nations remain more comfortable than the non-white Third World nations and so long as these white First World nations present an ersatz human vacuum, and offer only minor resistance to the immigration. If white First World nations become more uncomfortable, if their populations rise, and if the resistance is increased, massive immigration will slow down and eventually stop.
The invasion is being facilitated by our modern mass
transportation and is being enabled by white people who have been conditioned
and brow beaten into a collective aracial state of mind where they believe,
or are forced to pretend they believe, that race doesn't exist and that
all people are fungible. Replace this white person in Holland or Denmark
or France or Germany or the U.S. or any other traditionally white nation
with this non-white person, and those caught up in aracial race-doesn't-exist
thinking won't say anything. And, if they do say something, it'll usually
be couched in PC terms about these others not assimilating. In other
words, it's okay, to hear some people tell it, if these nations become
non-white so long as the invaders become darker versions of the people
already there. Thus, to those who think this way, the invaders are okay
in, say, Germany, so long as these invaders wear lederhosen and speak
German. Somehow, that's supposed to make them German and okay.
Let's not shrink from the truth. If we really want to be honest, we have to admit that we can't intelligently discuss the present immigration situation unless we also discuss race and ethnicity. The reality of the human condition is that genes matter as much with us as they do with birds or ants or plants or any other living things. People build their societies in certain ways depending on their genes as surely as birds build certain types of nests depending on their genes. The so-called Western World is the way it is because of the dominant genes that built it. And, the rest of the world is the way it is because of the dominant genes that built it also. Maybe we humans are too close to ourselves to see this or maybe we're just too arrogant and give so-called free will too much credit for our actions. If we could see us as we can see ants, we'd realize that this type of human ant builds this type of ant hill and this other one builds this other type.
With the above as background; say you believe that
the cause of most human conflicts is the result of what you think are
not real, but just "perceived" differences between races,
religions and nations. In other words, your senses are lying to you.
White people are the same as black people and yellow people and brown
people and red people. And in religions, why, they all believe the same
things when reduced to their basics. Nations? Artificial fences to separate
people who are all the same.
Say you further believe that the way to avoid conflicts is to eliminate what you (wrongly) think are these false perceived differences between races, religions and nations and blend all races, religions and nations together.
Say you're President George W. Bush or any of a number of other leaders who appear to believe the statements in the two prior paragraphs. I call people with these views: Blenders. In their purest, most radical form, Blenders want to blend away all human differences in favor of a one size fits all plain wrap human type.
As a powerful Blender, what steps might you take to
try to make our world a peaceful place of milk and honey (at least in
your mind)? Right. You'd probably use your power and influence to try
to blend away differences--remove the extremes--and end up with a conformist
average. You would try to eliminate the too hot and the too cold porridge
and end up, like Goldilocks, with the just right porridge in the middle--the
bland and conformist Tan Everyman clustered under the center of the
bell curve in all characteristics. He's not too dark. He's not too light.
He's just right. He's not too tall. He's not too small. He's just right.
He's not too smart. He's not too dumb. He's just right.
But, how do you get people to blend together genetically
in a so-called free society? First, you might "educate" the
public to believe that there are no racial differences worth spit. You
might also enact laws promoting integration. Then, you'll always deny
that any differences exist. Your big lie, that you'll repeat over and
over again is that race doesn't exist. You might even go so far as to
run people out of town on a rail if they indicate there are racial differences.
Remember Jimmy the Greek? Poor Jimmy was praising black athletes, but
he got fired because his praise indicated that blacks have different
musculature than whites. A physician in France received similar treatment
when he started lowering the black infant mortality rate by delivering
black babies earlier than he would deliver white babies. His theory
is that blacks have a slightly shorter gestation period than whites.
Now there's a controversy over a new heart medicine that doesn't seem
to work very well in whites, but saves black lives. Darn racist pill.
There are those who are trying to hide the fact that this black heart
pill works on blacks and not on whites. Such racially specific medicine
just gives evidence to the notion that people aren't just different
because of different skin colors but that they are different from the
blueprint on up. To understand that there are such differences starts
a whole cascade of ideas that the Blenders don't want to happen.
Anyway, your goal, if you are a Blender, remember,
is to convince everyone that there are no real racial differences. The
second thing you might do is to look at the racial demographics of your
nation. Is it too white? Let in more blacks, browns and yellows. Is
it too black? Allow in whites, browns and yellows. Then, try to keep
the various races from finding their identity in their race, and constantly
throw them together in all sorts of social situations so that the mating
instinct will take over and they'll tend to meet and mate. It's really
no more complicated than that. If you are a Blender you don't have to
know much about genetics. All you have to do is work with percentages
of various racial hues to come up with the result you want. This is
so, because as most aware white people know, skin color is more than
just skin color. It is an outward marker for a whole host of differences.
Work as though you're mixing paint to help arrive at a blended color,
and adjust the percentages of different peoples you allow in to get
the color you want. Soon, most people will carry genes from all racial
groups and will find it difficult to identify with any race. Your hope
is that this will help end racial conflicts. Since you don't believe
that people are different, it doesn't matter that your children or grandchildren
don't look like you. This brown one is the same as this black one or
this white one or this yellow one.
What about religious conflicts? Same principle. To accomplish religious blending, you would encourage ecumenism and outreach efforts by different religions to "understand" each other. In fact, what you really want to happen is for those who are meeting and talking to abandon those parts of their religions that may conflict with other religions. As a Blender you probably don't mind that our various religions carry different names so long as their rough edges are filed down so that all religions are "tolerant" and accepting of other religious views. What you are aiming for is a consensus religion and you'll using well known psychological principles to bring most people on board and find consensus. You'll have a religion that is not too this and not too that, but just right. And, what about those religious believers in various religions who really do believe that God is in charge, not humans, and that they must obey God even if what they think He wants isn't PC? As a Blender, you will try to discredit these people as fanatics so that others will avoid them and accept your mild, middle of the bell curve beliefs.
What about national conflicts? Promote globalism, which
is just Blending in the area of economics and social structures.
If you, dear reader, have trouble understanding why Bush is motivated to have the U.S. have open borders, ask yourself if the above, or some variation of the above, might explain his words and actions. If you still don't get it, take a look at the next George Bush on the scene--George P. Bush, of Florida--who is half Mexican. The Bush family is blending itself. That's right, folks, the next George Bush is a mestizo.
I know the views contained in this column aren't ones
shared by all who are concerned about illegal immigration, and I know
that it is de rigueur to try to run away from race and ethnicity by
saying things such as "We don't mind legal immigration, we just
don't want illegal immigration." However, if this is the case,
then why are so many people upset that Bush wants to legalize all illegal
aliens? If they're made legal, would that make them okay with those
who focus on legal versus illegal?
|Unless we understand the world wide dynamic of what's
going on with the movement of populations and related issues, we'll never
be able to solve our problems and the United States will fall to Third
The above can be summed up this way: Behind many of the troubling things we see going on in the world today is a philosophy or world view of Blending, even though few people call it that. Some might call blending by another term: soft genocide.
# # #
THREE BOOKS BY HARD TO PIGEONHOLE H. MILLARD
All three books are now listed on Amazon.com.
The lefties at the OC WEEKLY said Millard is one of OC's most frightening people.
"Millard is an important writer" New Nation
Alone & Homeless Jack's Religion
messages of ennui and meaning in post-american america by H. Millard
In Ourselves Alone and Homeless Jack's Religion, H. Millard, the hard to pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category bending commentaries on post-American America. The commentaries deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics in Millard's edgy style and lead up to Homeless Jack's Religion, in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. Browse Before You Buy ISBN: 0-595-32646-3
ROAMING THE WASTELANDS |
- (ISBN: 0-595-22811-9)
H. Millards latest sacred cow toppling book, is now
available at Amazon.com by clicking on this link
or by calling 1-877-823-9235.
A funand soberingthing to read - Alamance Independent
THE OUTSIDER - (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9)