"I saw this news report the other day, man,
about this psychologist guy named Dr. Alan Slater over in England who did a study
on new born babies to try to find out if humans learn what is beautiful or whether
we're programmed with that information. What Dr. Slater did was take a bunch of
babies whose average age was 2 1/2 days old and showed each of them two photos
at a time. One photo was of an attractive female face. The other was of a less
attractive female face. All of the babies spent far more time looking at the attractive
faces than the unattractive ones and some babies spent 90% of their time looking
at the attractive faces.
"Most people probably missed the deeper significance
of the story and just nudged each other and said, 'See, beautiful people have
it easier in life.' While that may be true, the real story is about genes and
religion and much more.
"What do you mean?" I asked.
"Those evil people who are trying to kill us
off by having us blend in with all other humans and who thus want us to destroy
ourselves as "ourselves" are trying to reprogram us with new incorrect
defaults. They've slipped Trojan Horses into our brains and have infected us with
destructive viruses so that our hard drives are being corrupted and destroyed.
They want us to think, for example, that black is beautiful, when our defaults
say white is beautiful because our defaults are white. Black is beautiful, man,
at least to other blacks, because that's what their defaults say, or should say.
are, but there are usually deeper meanings to surface things. You have to understand
some of this stuff for it all to make sense and come circling around. Arman teaches
that we are sensory beings of flesh. The real 'us' isn't some inner spirit that
is different from us and that has just inhabited our 'evil' flesh. Some false
religions teach that and then say that we must struggle to overcome the flesh
and its urgings. That's wrong. Our flesh is good. It is not evil. Any inner spirit
or soul that exists, arises from and exists because of our flesh. It is like the
perfume of a rose. Arman also says that we are not supposed to deny our senses,
but that we are supposed to use and sharpen them and that humans have for too
long tried to deny their senses in their attempts to find God or higher states
of consciousness or to be holy or whatever, and that this is wrong. He also says
that the universe is not an illusion as some believe, but is real. What we see
is what we get, most of the time.
"See, what's been happening is that those evil
genocidists who want all humans to blend together as one new human type have been
trying to condition us away from our natural instincts about what is beautiful
and what isn't. They tell us to deny our eyes and not believe what has been programmed
into our brains so we'll be more accepting of mating with people unlike us and
who we don't instinctively see as beautiful. I'm tellin' you man that if research
were done like with those babies, but with racial elements added in, we'd probably
find that white babies favor white people and black babies favor black people
and all other people favor their own kind. It's in the genes. It's all about survival.
You know what would happen, though, if they tried to do the study with, say, a
photo of a black woman and a photo of a white woman side by side being shown to
white babies? They'd try to screw up the results by using a black woman with a
lot of white blood so that her facial features would be more white than black,
but her skin would still not be white. And, they'd use a white woman whose features
are not the white ideal and who is thus not attractive according to the inner
template of the babies. Then, if the babies looked at the black woman with the
white features more than the white woman without the ideal white features, the
genocidists would publish the results and say white babies prefer black women
and thus we should all mate together. I'm telling you, man, that's how they do
some of those phony race studies. They're often mostly just anti-white propaganda
and attempts to seep self-genocidal thoughts into our subconscious. Most people
who read about these things don't bother to look at how the research was done
and just accept the screwy, false conclusions.
Our genes give us a natural visual template in our
brains to tell us what is beautiful and what isn't. We're given an internal picture
of the ideal type. We're born with it. As we get older, and for a variety of reasons,
we may be artificially attracted to those who deviate from our natural ideal.
This is often the result of conditioning or of a survival response. Survival means
having offspring. Look, it's like our brains are saying, I'd really like to be
with this or that really beautiful or handsome person, but I'm not that great
looking myself so I don't have a chance. If I hope to mate at all, I'd better
compromise. In other words, most of us are a little like drunken sailors in a
bar near closing time who suddenly see beauty in a snaggle toothed floozy hanging
off the end of the bar.
You want me to sum this up, man? Trust your eyes so long as you have not been conditioned away from the pure and genuine vision that you were born with. And, if you have been so conditioned, and the haters really try to do this, then strip away the conditioning and get back to what is real, authentic and genuine and see others as a baby sees them. If you are black, then black is beautiful. If you are white, white is beautiful. If you are brown, brown is beautiful. If you are red, then red is beautiful. If you are yellow, then yellow is beautiful. Beauty is in the genes of the beholder and the beheld. But, if an entire people of one genotype finds people of another genotype, instead of people of their own genotype, beautiful, then this indicates that God or nature is saying that the genotype that doesn't find its own genotype to be beautiful, is heading for a die off. This is so, because as already stated, we humans, of all types, are influenced to mate via our eyes. If our own kind aren't attractive to us, then we're not going to mate with them and produce more children like us.
# # #
THREE BOOKS BY H. MILLARD
All three books are now listed on Amazon.com. Just click on the "http://www..." links after each book.
Theyre also available at quality brick and mortar stores or can be ordered by them for you.
IF ANY OF THE LINKS ARENT CLICKABLE, JUST CUT AND PASTE THEM INTO YOUR BROWSER WINDOW.
Alone & Homeless Jack's Religion |
messages of ennui and meaning in post-american america by H. Millard
In Ourselves Alone and Homeless Jack's Religion, H. Millard, the hard to pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category bending commentaries on post-American America. The commentaries deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics in Millard's edgy style and lead up to Homeless Jack's Religion, in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. Browse Before You Buy ISBN: 0-595-32646-3
ROAMING THE WASTELANDS |
- (ISBN: 0-595-22811-9)
H. Millards latest sacred cow toppling book, is now
available at Amazon.com by clicking on this link
or by calling 1-877-823-9235.
A funand soberingthing to read - Alamance Independent
THE OUTSIDER - (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9)