There is something in human psychology that causes far
too many people to simply believe the name callers instead of using
critical thinking skills to intelligently think through an issue. Maybe
it's a little like the psychology at work where a person who criticizes
food in a restaurant is often thought to be more intelligent than the
people who don't criticize the food. At any rate, when a person calls
another person or group, "racist," the focus of most eyes
and ears seems to go to the person or group that has been called the
name instead of to the person who does the name calling, which is where
the focus should often be.
If you have access to the Times, please read the column
for yourself, but for those who may be reading this without such access,
the story of Toypurina, in its simplest terms, is about
this Gabrielino Indian woman who helped lead a revolt against the San
Gabriel Mission in the California of the late 1700's. In the column, we
read that after the failed revolt and her capture, Toypurina told the
judges hearing her case that: "I hate the padres and all of you [white
people], for living here on my native soil, for trespassing upon the land
of my forefathers and despoiling our tribal domains...." She also
called the judges and other white people, "white invaders."
But, the Times would probably go even further. After
writing about the hate and bigotry of the white Toypurina, we'd be treated
to a whole series of columns as the different editors and writers at
the Times each wrote about a piece of the story from their perspectives.
Thus, we might see the food section baking up some "Tolerance Cookies."
We might see the editorial writers telling readers that "we're
all people, and we all bleed red blood." We might see the science
writers telling us that people are almost all the same genetically.
Ahh, but if you think this, then you're wrong. European-Americans
are being driven out through assimilation and attrition. The European-American
birth rate isn't very high, and there is little
incentive to birth more European-American babies to help on the family
farm or to help support the family, as once was the case. Now, instead
of an incentive to supply needed workers through the internal growth of
this nation by births of European-Americans, the needed workers are being
imported to the country. So, why have babies? "Hey, there are too
many people on the planet, and it would interfere with my life style,"
seems to be the cry from many European-Americans. So, many European-Americans
don't have children or have below replacement levels of children.
Meanwhile, massive waves of illegal aliens are pouring across our borders to fill the need for entry level workers that aren't being filled by the internal births. And, when the childless European-Americans die, their niche often isn't filled by other European-Americans, but by the children of the illegal aliens. And, as this continues, the complexion of America is changing. Even now there are far fewer whites in proportion to the population than ever before. And, that, dear friends, is an indication that whites are being driven out and replaced. However, if you say this, or talk about the genocide of white people through assimilation and other factors, don't expect the Times to call you a "freedom fighter." That term is reserved for those who hate white people.
# # #