German "superboy"
by H. Millard (c) 2004
H. Millard index

It is common to excoriate the Nazis for trying to breed the Superman--actually, the Overman--a human being who, among other things, would be stronger, smarter, less disease prone than most humans, and who would be the next step up the evolutionary ladder.

Of course, it's perfectly okay to selectively breed other animals, but we humans are somehow supposed to be above scientifically breeding ourselves for better qualities. Instead of trying to improve ourselves, we're supposed to just let the blind workings of nature have their way. After all, we're humans. We're just below the angels. Of course, it was humans who decided that we're just below the angels. Other creatures might not feel so sure about that.

In truth, there's nothing wrong with wanting to make better, healthier humans so long as it's done in the right way and avoids the mistakes of the old eugenics movement of the past. Scientific breeding is nothing less than willed evolution. And, if we want humans to evolve, we may have to start paying as much attention to our breeding as we do to the breeding of dogs, cats and horses.

As background, consider the fact that some people believe that we have reached a stasis point in the history of human beings when we must either step in and guide our evolution up or we will start devolving down. When thinking about this subject, it may be helpful to imagine that nature has had our species (and all other species, for that matter) on some sort of automatic evolutionary escalator and that as the escalator moves us higher, some get off at lower floors while others keep riding. Could it be possible that humans have now reached a place between floors where the escalator has slowed down and is preparing to reverse itself and become a down escalator instead of an up escalator? If so, we're going to have to struggle to remain right where we are by walking fast enough to compensate for the downward movement of the escalator. And, if we start walking really fast, we may be able to reach the next higher floor. If we do reach that next higher floor, and thus move higher on the evolutionary scale which gets harder and harder the higher you move, maybe there will be no way from that floor to the ones above except difficult and dangerous stairs that we have to somehow find and then really climb all by ourselves. Will we try to make that climb that will most assuredly require enormous mental strength and which will probably also require some sort of religious or spiritual knowledge to overcome the inertia of our existence?

Of course, the easiest thing to do would be just to stay on the escalator that is now going down, and it'd automatically return us to lower floors with no effort on our part. That, with or without the escalator imagery, appears to be where humanity finds itself at this time.

While such talk of escalators and about walking faster might help us visualize the process, such examples don't help us in a practical sense. What must we actually do to will our evolution? How do we move higher? The answer, as you already know from the earlier paragraphs, is that we must breed ourselves for those qualities and features that we believe are higher and more desirable and which are uniquely representative or emblematic of our genotype while we attempt to breed out those qualities and features that we don't consider so desirable and which we have inherited from earlier forms. In real world terms, it's as simple as, say, choosing mates with blue eyes if we consider blue eyes to be a desirable feature and then having as many babies as is physically possible.

Of course, the multiracialists don't want us to think along these lines or to try to breed up. The multiracialists' idea of a perfect world is apparently to have all humans be pretty much the same in most characteristics--a one size fits all Tan Everyman. This means, to them, that white genes--which are the rare and different genes among humans--must be destroyed. When I speak of "white genes" here, I mean those genes or combinations of genes that express themselves in ways that add up to producing non-Jewish white European descended peoples (who are only about 10% of all humans on earth).

The multiracialists know that breeding the Tan Everyman requires no real effort other than that required in breaking down white people's resistance to their own genocide. It is white people, by their very presence, and even when they don't realize it, who are standing in the way of the creation of the Tan Everyman. Remove white people by all means possible including convincing the weak minded ones among whites that there are no real genetic differences between the races of man and most of the battle is won.

On the other hand, breeding the species up, maybe to a White Everyman, requires real effort. In this regard, I'm reminded of some of the things that Homeless Jack has said about white people being the human equivalent of light and that they, like light, can only exist with the expenditure of a lot of energy and with constant struggle. In other words, it takes effort to have light, and if Jack is right, to have white people, while it does not take effort to have darkness and non-white people. Anyway, that's what Jack says he read, and maybe it does present us with some of those hidden connections that seem to invisibly crisscross the cosmos that cause weird things and so-called coincidences.

Evolution leading to speciation is a relatively slow process involving many matings and isolation. What about something faster--willed mutation? Is that possible? Mutations occur all the time. Many people reading this probably have a mutated gene or two and don't even know it. Some of these mutations will remain unknown and will disappear in the next generation as the person with the mutation mates with those without it. However, if the person mates with a person with the same type of mutated gene, then the offspring may end up with two copies of the mutated gene and in this case, the mutation may be expressed in some way. The reason that close relatives are not supposed to mate is because the chance of passing on two genes with the same harmful defect is greater in such matings. Of course, and on the plus side, the chance of passing on two genes with the same beneficial improvement is also greater when close relatives mate.

A good example of this mutation process comes from news reports this week about a four year old boy who, ironically, is from Germany. Doctors have discovered that the child has a mutation that causes him to be extremely strong and to have about half the body fat of normal kids his age. It turns out that the kid has a mutant DNA segment that blocks production of the protein myostatin that limits muscle growth. As a result, the kid, who apparently otherwise looks like any other normal kid his age, is something of a mini muscleman. Reports say that he can hold seven-pound weights with his arms extended; something that is difficult for many adults to do. Doctors say that his mother has one copy of the mutated gene and one normal one while the boy has two of the mutated genes. This means that his father also had at least one copy of the mutated gene and passed that on to the child. No information about the father was disclosed in news reports, but it was stated that the mother's brother and three other close male relatives all were unusually strong.

Suppose, that when this kid grows up he decides that he wants to preserve his mutation. To accomplish this, he could try to find a mate or mates who also have two versions of the mutated genes. This wouldn't be that difficult with modern gene testing. Then, he and the mate(s) he chooses would probably produce children who are just as strong as he is. If these children then decided to continue the process, they would find mates with the gene mutation and have their own children. If all of these people decided to have as many children as possible and if all of them worked to breed true, eventually this family might become a tribe, then a nation, and maybe, eventually, a different species of human. That's what is meant by willed evolution and willed mutation.

To give this a little different perspective, you may have heard about a race horse named Smarty Jones who was expected to, but who didn't, win the Kentucky Derby earlier this month. Had Smarty Jones won the Kentucky Derby he would have become the first Triple Crown winner in many years. What you may not have heard, was that 17 of the 18 horses in the race, including Smarty Jones, were all related through a family line that went back to a horse named Native Dancer who won the Preakness and Belmont in 1953.

So, you can breed horses for speed and that, to us, is an improvement of the species when we're talking about race horses, but what do we breed humans for? Speed? Not likely. Big brains? Sure, but that's not enough. We could end up with big brained humans who are weak or who have other defects. Remember, designing creatures is like designing machines. There are tradeoffs to be made. Build for certain kinds of strength, for example, and you often lose speed. Race horses aren't good at pulling plows and plow horses aren't good at racing. It's virtually impossible to design anything that is good at everything.

What if we do breed humans and what if we're wrong in thinking that the characteristics we're breeding for are good ones? What then? Well, we just adjust as we go. That's what nature does. Most white people thinking about this subject would probably say that we should breed for white skin, blue eyes, blond hair, thin body build, big brains--sort of like what we see in the best of the Scandinavians, but perhaps with more robustness than we normally associate with present day Scandinavians. Maybe those who think this way are right. Certainly, it appears that the Scandinavian human type is as far removed from the Tan Everyman type as possible, and maybe this means that the Scandinavian type is the ideal type for white people. Then again, there are all those dumb blond jokes. Hmmm.

One thing is certain, humans generally seem less concerned about improving their breed than they are about improving horses, dogs and cats.

One last thing from the news this week: Scientists now report that they have figured out how to tell the skin and eye color of criminal suspects from DNA left at crime scenes. This is a discovery that was predictable to those who understand the importance of DNA. Every bit of us is in those spiraling strands.

Even with this further proof that skin color is not just skin deep, the multiracialists will, no doubt, continue with their lies about there being only one human race. The sad thing is that many white children are propagandized with these lies to the point where they internalize them and thereafter never doubt that they are true. Then, when these Stepfordized white children grow up, many of them commit their own genocide by mating with those who are not of their genotype.

Homeless Jack even links DNA to being able to understand a little about God. He says those spirals within us, when they're right, are the physical part of our "essence" and that they vibrate in tune with the spirals of God. He also sometimes talks about the light within causing white skin without.

#  #  #


Available at finer bookstores, by phone, or on the net.

Roaming the Wastelands 1. ROAMING THE WASTELANDS
- (ISBN: 0-595-22811-9)
H. Millard’s latest sacred cow toppling book, is now
available at by clicking on this link

or by calling 1-877-823-9235.

“A fun–and sobering–thing to read” - Alamance Independent

The Outsider

2. THE OUTSIDER - (ISBN: 0-595-19424-9)
H. Millard’s underground classic story of alienation is
available at by clicking on the this link
 or by calling 1-877-823-9235:
"Millard is an important writer" New Nation News
"Millard is an original. His books aren't like your typical fiction.
If you don't know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac, Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche"
- a reader.


Recommend this page to a friend